2026 · Machine Learning Science and Technology

QuantumCanvas: A Multimodal Benchmark for Learning Two-Body Quantum Interactions

Can Polat , Mustafa Kurban , Erchin Serpedin , Hasan Kurban

Research highlights

QuantumCanvas: testing what each modality actually contributes

Study two-body quantum interactions with controlled numerical and image representations.

Why we investigated it

Adding a visual modality does not establish that it supplies independent physical information.

What the work contributes

QuantumCanvas compares graph, vision, and fusion models on element-pair-disjoint splits, with controls on image layout and generating scalars.

What the evidence shows

For the controlled gap and dipole tests, shuffled images do not worsen accuracy and raw scalars outperform both image variants. Pretraining helps in 11 of 16 transfer comparisons.

Build on this work

Use the benchmark and controls to distinguish representation effects from genuinely additional information.

  • Quantum interactions
  • Multimodal benchmarks
  • Representation learning
  • Controlled evaluation
Abstract
Abstract Most molecular and materials machine-learning models fit correlations across whole molecules or crystals rather than learning the quantum interactions between atomic pairs. Yet bonding, charge redistribution, orbital hybridization, and electronic coupling all emerge from these two-body interactions. We introduce QuantumCanvas , a multimodal benchmark that treats the two-body quantum system as the minimal, exhaustively enumerable unit of interatomic interaction. It covers 2850 element–element pairs, each at a single optimized geometry, and evaluates 17 benchmark target quantities spanning electronic, thermodynamic, dipole, and charge-derived each unique properties. Each pair is also represented by ten-channel images of orbital populations and charge- and dipole-derived fields that encode angular and electrostatic structure without explicit atomic coordinates. Benchmarking graph, vision, and fusion architectures on element-pair-disjoint splits reveals modality-specific inductive biases: graph encoders achieve the lowest MAE on most reported targets, while late fusion gives the lowest MAE for the reported Mermin free-energy label. Controls on the energy gap and dipole magnitude show that destroying the spatial layout of the images does not degrade accuracy and that a model fed the generating scalars directly outperforms both image variants: the rendering is an alternative encoding of the same scalars, not an independent signal. Pretraining on QuantumCanvas lowers mean test error in 11 of 16 encoder-target comparisons across QM9 , MD17 , and CrysMTM . QuantumCanvas thus provides a controlled, physically grounded testbed for studying which signals each modality captures, how they combine, and how they transfer across molecular, dynamical, and crystalline regimes.
Cite
@article{polat2026quantumcanvas,
  title = {QuantumCanvas: A Multimodal Benchmark for Learning Two-Body Quantum Interactions},
  author = {Can Polat and Mustafa Kurban and Erchin Serpedin and Hasan Kurban},
  year = 2026,
  journal = {Machine Learning Science and Technology},
  doi = {10.1088/2632-2153/aea5d6},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2632-2153/aea5d6/pdf},
}